Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 19,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
California Emergency Physicians Medical Group; Med America; Mark Alderdice; Robert Buscho, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (No. 12-16514) (April 8, 2015). [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 1:16 pm
Circuit erred in invalidating an EPA rule that implemented limits on cross-state air pollution, and Schuette v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:48 am
” Esperanza Andrade, Secretary of State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 5:03 am
Title Agency, LLC, 545 F.3d 241, 247 (3d Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:13 am
American Soc. for Testing & Materials v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
EU General Court explains how the relevant assessment is to be undertaken | High Court employs ‘intention to target’ approach to determine application of EU/UK law in online trade mark infringement case | There's a new IPO report on designs infringement - game-changer or stating the obvious? [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 4:10 am
Geisha registered Japonais with the State of Illinois, but never federally registered the mark. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:54 am
Loufrani v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 10:11 pm
Jones Day v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm
In so doing, the Court overruled its own 1989 decision in Paramount Pest Control Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:55 am
” Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:24 am
Mark Satta* Last month, Aaron and Melissa Klein, a couple who owned a bakery in Oregon, asked the Supreme Court to review a ruling from the Court of Appeals of the State of Oregon, which held that the Kleins had violated Oregon state law by discriminating based on sexual orientation when they refused to bake a custom cake for a same-sex wedding. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 12:47 pm
’State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 10:18 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:20 am
Every year, the first Monday in October marks the beginning of a new term. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:43 pm
There have been a few cases in California where litigants continue to hash out causes of action under state spam statutes (see Hypertouch v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:26 pm
Couture v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:25 am
First, in Lucia Marett v. [read post]
