Search for: "State v. Root"
Results 4081 - 4093
of 4,093
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
Note that I write this post during the public hearings for the January 6th Commission, which is faithfully documenting an attempted coup of the United States government that would not have been possible without a rampant populist fervor that continues to this day. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 12:58 pm
Supreme Court issued its decision in Counterman v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official court decisions ever published in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
This is because a decade ago, privacy scholarship got rooted in consumer autonomy. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
History of US Statutory Mechanical Royalty Rate-Setting As the CRB is well aware, the establishment of a compulsory mechanical rights licensing system, and the setting of a statutory mechanical royalty rate for the manufacture and distribution of sound carriers reproducing musical compositions, has its roots in the US Copyright Act of 1909. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)* * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)* * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
Other states are still a work in progress, though they have been moving toward embracing international standards: e.g., Paraguay. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 2:57 am
I am back in Washington, DC, where I'm visiting at Georgetown for the Fall Semester after four days in Chicago for American Political Science Association annual meeting. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Let me begin by stating that my views are my own as a Commissioner and not necessarily those of the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
