Search for: "State v. Word" Results 4081 - 4100 of 40,637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
I find the start of each academic year invariably invigorating. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 11:48 am by Giles Peaker
  The appellants would have been better advised to state the facts relevant to their occupation of the property in their own words and to explain what they knew of the others who were not going to be called to give evidence. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
”  These simple yet powerful words can stop the government, with all ‘s incredible power, in its tracks. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am by Camilla Hrdy
In the course of this work I encountered Section 1905 in the following way.There was, and still is, a federal law on the books enacted in 2007 called the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act that mandates that important information from the majority of significant clinical trials run in the United States be published on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
Even as a matter of English, the word “exceptional” does not appear to add a great deal to “compelling”. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 8:39 am
Yesterday, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a ruling on the parties' motions for summary judgment in Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
[Note: this opinion is over 25,000 words long, which helps explain why it’s taken me until now to blog it. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff liberally employs words or phrases such as “intentionally deceived” or “intentionally misled” or “deceitfully” throughout the PAC, but such catch phrases are too conclusory to plead intent with particularity. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm by admin
Gelbach states his claim in the context of discussing a single randomized controlled trial (ASCOT-LLA), but his broad pronouncements are carelessly framed such that others may take them to apply to a single observational study, with its greater threats to internal validity. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 11:27 am by Jeremy Meisinger
As we had previously blogged, the FTC in guidance following the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]