Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(IP Think Tank) A defining time for the IP market (IAM) Busting an intellectual capital myth (Pat Sullivan’s Blog) Governments, financial stakeholders meet on policy for IP as collateral (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP finance) How much should you spend on start-up marketing? [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
They filled up answering machine tapes, preventing consumers from receiving important and personal messages they actually wanted. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:11 am
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
Hardly any tax pros are willing to work on complicated, time consuming cases like this without getting paid. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:58 am
Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:25 pm
” It also can set up a market where consumers can choose among low-price and low-service brands, high-price and high-service brands, and everything in between. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:17 pm
” It also can set up a market where consumers can choose among low-price and low-service brands, high-price and high-service brands, and everything in between. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:35 am
V. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
But it isn’t about elections. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
Michael Geist doesn’t like the TPP. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
At the FTC, for example, Second Requests have been staffed with only one lawyer and one economist (while a typical Second Request would usually have much larger teams of lawyers and economists), and the FTC has begun asking attorneys from its Consumer Protection and Policy Planning offices to review mergers (frequently a new role for these lawyers).11 The agencies have also been pressing parties for more stringent requirements during the merger review. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Drop dead stylish: mitigating environmental impact of fur production through consumer protection in the Truth in Fur Labeling Act of 2010. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
See, e.g., Peterson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
” Next up is Alaska v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
Ringgold v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:41 am
That statute ostensibly protects consumers from a variety of abusive collection methods. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:59 am
http://t.co/aep7bawL4a -> TripAdvisor’s “Dirtiest Hotels” List Isn’t Defamatory—Seaton v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
It hasn’t explicitly said so, of course, but that’s my takeaway from its protest of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act this past January. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:08 am
Santander Consumer USA. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 2:22 pm
In the Express Scripts, Inc. v. [read post]
