Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 11,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2015, 8:35 am
(California - Bad Faith) by Ken Vanko [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
Boldly proclaiming that old constitutional principles do not yield to new waves of technology, but leaving itself chances to make some exceptions, the Supreme Court on Monday flatly barred state legislatures and Congress from trying to shield children from violent video games, took on anew the issue of whether government can protect children from dirty words and adult nudity on TV and radio, and promised a new decision on high-tech police surveillance and its impact on… [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 3:53 am
Since CIGA did not seek judicial review after adverse decisions were returned, the court said those decisions were final and conclusive.Thus, "CIGA is barred by res judicata from relitigating its right to reimbursement," the court said.The 2nd DCA acknowledged the public policy behind the Insurance Code's limitation on CIGA's liability, but it said that this public policy could not outweigh the public policy interests in an expeditious and inexpensive system of workers'… [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court reversed that ruling, seemingly restoring the status quo. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Ross, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge by a pork industry trade group to California’s Proposition 12—which bars in-state sale of pork unless the pigs whose slaughtered bodies produced that pork were raised in accordance with the state’s minimum standards for humane treatment of the slaughtered pigs themselves and the sows who birthed and suckled them as piglets. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
I wholeheartedly urge the California legislature to take up that issue as well, and to consider a separate bill involving state and local institutions. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 1:12 pm
These retweeter defendants moved to dismiss, arguing that the plaintiff’s claims against them were barred by section 230(c) of the CDA. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
There is also this fear whether this ruling would preclude an immigrant friendly state like New York, Hawaii, Washington or California to challenge an anti-immigrant policy of a future president. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
California's a big state with roiling cities. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Upon appearing in court as scheduled, and as stated in the bail bond agreement, you get your money back. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Upon appearing in court as scheduled, and as stated in the bail bond agreement, you get your money back. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Simply stated: “[a] collateral attack is not a substitute for an appeal” reasoned the Second Appellate District Court in Bowman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
California AB 118 Defines public safety programs, including public defenders, as local responsibilities. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm
Because of the tradition of senatorial courtesy with lower federal court appointments, even Democratic-appointed federal judges skew conservative in red states with Republican U.S. senators; the same phenomenon is seen in reverse in deep blue states. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Notwithstanding the birth certificate, however, Sally took the baby and moved to California. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:28 pm
Superior Court (1994) 26 Cal.App.4th 239, a state appellate panel explained the California class certification process: "‘As soon as practical after commencement of a lawsuit that purports to be a class action, a hearing must be held on whether it will be allowed to proceed as such. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:43 am
LEXIS 27818 (ED VA, March 6, 2015), a Virginia federal district court dismissed a complaint by a Nation of Islam inmate that Virginia state prison rules prevented him from purchasing CDs of sermons of Minister Farrakhan directly from The Final Call and barred Arabic language CDs.In Lucas v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
For instance, although the final rule permits non-compete agreements entered into with “senior executives” before the rule’s effective date to remain in force, if such an agreement does not comply with applicable state law (e.g., in California, whose law generally bars post-employment restrictive covenants), then it still would not be enforceable (even if it might be under the final rule). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:22 am
"The State Bar of Texas adopted a voluntary specialty certification program for paralegals in 1974 which was structured after the voluntary specialty certification program for attorneys in Texas. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:35 am
A number of states (including California) have enacted laws that protect LGBT workers, but at the federal level, there is no such guaranteed protection. [read post]
