Search for: "US v. Weekes" Results 4081 - 4100 of 39,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am by NATASHA NGUYEN
Under this programme, he would be required to complete 30 hours a week of unpaid work renovating and distributing used furniture for six months or until he found work for 16 hours a week or more. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:21 pm
  Why don't you try not to use it for a while -- you're in prison, after all -- and come back in three weeks. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
| Sheeran v Chokri Part 2: Admission of similar fact evidence | New Year, Same Creative Authorship Requirement in US Copyright | Reader discount for IPKat book award titles! [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:28 pm
Not so fast…|European patent troll boom spurs Google, Adidas, Intel & Daimler backed IP2Innovate to demand Commission "get tough with US patent trolls"|AIPPI Report: Recapping 2016's most important soft IP casesNever Too Late 144 [week ending on Sunday 16 April]Around the IP blogs |Time to celebrate, debate and have fun! [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
Book review: You Don’t Own Me: How Mattel v MGA Entertainment Exposed Barbie’s Dark SideThis book, written by Orly Lobel, describes the behind the scenes action of the dispute between Mattel and MGA Entertainment, i.e., Barbie v Bratz. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:01 pm
And fair use, as we were reminded in Eldred v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:18 am by Mark Summerfield
Last week I wrote about the ways in which medical treatments – including pharmaceutical compounds and therapeutic methods – are protected using a variety of different forms of patent claim. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:13 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the district court’s ruling that the employer was judicially estopped from challenging the methodology used to calculate overtime damages was reversed (Dacar v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
In sum, despite clear constitutional protection for disruptive protest, ambiguities in the law give rise to colorable arguments justifying the over-policing of crowds this summer—if not the level of force used to disperse or arrest individuals.McKesson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:11 am by Kelly
Becton-Dickinson (Patent Docs) US government intervenes in patentability of genes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inovia) (BlawgIT) (IP Osgoode) US: BIO and AUTM fire back at gene patent foes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Patent Docs) US: IPO files amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) US: AIPLA submits amicus brief in AMP v… [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:44 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Supreme Court to Review Mississippi’s 15-Week Abortion Ban (Jess Bravin & Brent Kendall, The Wall Street Journal) Roe v. [read post]