Search for: "United States Solicitor General" Results 4081 - 4100 of 4,872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2010, 1:36 am by TJ McIntyre
It seems as though the controversy caused by the Chief State Solicitor's advice about purchasing cloud computing just won't go away. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:25 pm by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of the petitioners, Assistant to the Solicitor General Pratik Shah reiterated that the plain terms of Section 233(a) are broad enough to preclude Bivens actions even if Congress did not specifically contemplate such actions. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:13 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Kentucky) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Case in which the Solicitor General has recently filed a brief for the United States, as directed by the Court: Title: American Home Products Corporation v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the state, Michigan Solicitor General Eric Restuccia began by emphasizing the Court’s decision in North Carolina v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
SANDRA DAY O'CONNORFormer Justice of the United State Supreme Court- on - MONDAY, APRIL 5, 20107:00 P.M. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:30 am by Kristin Michelle Ekert
Intellectual property law is nothing new in the United States -- Congress passed its first patent statute in 1790 -- but it is "more consequential today than ever before," according to Seth Waxman, former Solicitor General and chair of the Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Practice Group at the Washington, D.C. firm WilmerHale.At the University of Pennsylvania Law School's 2010 Irving R. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:20 am by Anna Christensen
As Assistant to the Solicitor General Curtis E. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:18 pm by Lyle Denniston
Millett of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld in Washington, sharing 10 minutes of time with the U.S. government, represented by Deputy Solicitor General Edwin S. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:26 am by Aaron Bruhl
United States, 381 U.S. 353, 353 (1965) (vacating and remanding for new trial “[o]n consideration of the confession of error by the Solicitor General and upon examination of the entire record”). [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Legal Beagle
Proceedings in the Sheriff Court# When the applicant refused to pay the council for his share of the repair costs, the council brought proceedings in the Sheriff Court (the civil court of general jurisdiction). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:11 pm by Ashby Jones
(Representing the United States will be Deputy Solicitor General Michael R. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
Representing the United States will be Deputy Solicitor General Michael R. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am by Cathy Reno
  And Gerard Magliocca of Concurring Opinions shares Whelan’s recusal concern and deems it “not clear that Kagan has been a good Solicitor General. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
Case in which the United States recently filed an amicus brief in response to the Court’s call for the views of the Solicitor General: Title: Missouri Gas Energy v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:12 pm by Matt Sundquist
Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, a court can award to a party who prevails in an action against the United States the “fees and other expenses…incurred by”  that party if the position of the United States was not “substantially justified. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal made the government’s position clear:  the City violated Title VII each time it made a hiring decision based on an improper classification. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
Solicitor General Elena Kagan that the law would bar a lawyer from writing an amicus curiae brief on behalf of such a group in U.S. courts. 3rd Circuit Weighs Validity of Fines in 'Wardrobe Malfunction' Case The Legal Intelligencer Like the truth that is sometimes found in jest, a moment of levity in a court proceeding can sometimes help to crystallize a legal argument more cogently than the lengthy and serious discussion that preceded or followed it. [read post]