Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 6,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2017, 8:40 am
The Constitution’s Appointments Clause states that the president “shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors . . . and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 6:35 am
The notes then state none are present. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am
The AIA, Its Preclusion Statutes, and Cuozzo’s Path to the Supreme Court The 2011 America Invents Act (AIA) created new patent reviews within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), and covered business method review (CBM). [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:10 am
Monday the Court called for the views of the Solicitor General in Carmichael v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:33 pm
I have previously commented on Sorrell v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
In Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:42 pm
But the Court’s decision said nothing about the argument of the United States as amicus curiae that official immunity should still be available, so this issue remains undetermined. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 2:42 pm
That’s the problem the court faced in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 12:27 pm
” The insurance carrier was home based in another state and the policy was made available to large companies throughout the United States who used independent drivers like our client, through a trust company based in Washington, DC. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:04 pm
Rather, the United States Supreme Court has held that “[t]he copyright is limited to those aspects of the work—termed 'expression'—that display the stamp of the author's originality. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am
Two major projects of legal feminism in the United States—women’s suffrage as achieved by the Nineteenth Amendment—and equal protection of the laws without sex discrimination as achieved by Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s 1970s litigation strategy—tried to end legal patriarchy. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:21 am
See Maloney, et al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
United States, 320 U.S. 81, when we sustained these orders in so far as they applied a curfew requirement to a citizen of Japanese ancestry. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 6:33 am
As the California Supreme Court stated in Cobbs v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 9:10 am
Turning to comity, Kane described that doctrine as "an expression of one state's voluntary choice to defer to another state's policy. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:02 pm
Gonzales (8-1 decision rejecting broad application of the drug-aggravated-felony category to any state drug felony); Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:23 pm
" For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff's motion is denied, subject to any further consideration by the United States District Judge to whom this case is randomly assigned…. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:56 pm
Consider United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
”) United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
All these sources, in Judge Fletcher's excellent formulation, were laws for the United States, if not of the United States. [read post]
