Search for: "United States v. Paul"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 4,493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:40 am
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), (ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, David Spinoza Tanenhaus, ed., Gale, 2008).Amelia J. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
HayesBart ChiltonCarole JettElgie HolsteinElizabeth MontoyaSue TierneyCecilia V. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 5:32 pm
The case of the United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
One such so-called maxim originated with Justice Stone's "Footnote Four" in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
Strang v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:32 am
Most notably, in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 1:00 am
V. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 10:42 pm
Paul Co., 787 A.2d 376 (Pa. 2001) and the decision of the Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas in Harlan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
With the election of Barack Obama as the 44th President of the United States and with the Democrats gaining seats in the House and Senate, some changes in employment law, including wage and hour law, could be coming in the next four years. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:48 pm
Since reintroduction of the death penalty in 1976, Texas has been responsible for more than 35% of all executions in the United States and is responsible for one-half of the executions thus far in 2004. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
The Court concludes therefore that there is insufficient evidence to show general causation.Federal and State Courts have consistently determined that the cause or causes of MCS (IEI) cannot be reliably established by scientific proof (see, e.g., Oppenheimer v United Charities of NY, 266 AD2d 116, 698 NYS2d 144 [1st Dept 1999]; Frank v State of New York, 972 F Supp 130 [ND NY 1997]). [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 11:42 pm
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 97-2418 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 10:31 pm
In the case of FCC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:40 pm
In a short decision in the Newsday circulation fraud case, United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:39 pm
United States (06-6911), and as amicus supporting petitioners in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
Barnaba and the problems with the discovery process have delayed prosecution of United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
§ 1341, in a scheme to defraud the United States Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration of money and property by certifying non-qualifying entities for participation in Kentucky's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise ("DBE") program. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Class 46) New Zealand Two for one in the House: Treaties and Anti-Counterfeiting Bill (International Law Office) South Africa 'Softlifting' adds to South African piracy woes (Afro-IP) Spain 'Theory of consumer error' rejected in criminal trade mark proceedings in Spain (Class 46) Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE) reports progress in quest for improving legal protection for ‘Made in… [read post]
