Search for: "A R C C A Inc" Results 4101 - 4120 of 8,833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2014, 5:14 pm
Randall, president and CEO of Amego Inc., the school and residential treatment center the boy was attending. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
That’s the issue in Wandering Dago Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Cinar: Blatant Copying is Substantial Copying http://t.co/TO9Kv0tJuI -> http://t.co/s1nb3ccfiz recommended reads http://t.co/jgvPKGZsxp -> Nimmer Urges Congress To Reaffirm Copyright Act’s “Making Available” Right http://t.co/G3T0a7pQ4n -> Net neutrality gets a kick in the teeth | ZDNet http://t.co/NIVsYzOVum -> Oracle suit against third party maintenance contractor ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Cinar: Blatant Copying is Substantial Copying http://t.co/TO9Kv0tJuI -> http://t.co/s1nb3ccfiz recommended reads http://t.co/jgvPKGZsxp -> Nimmer Urges Congress To Reaffirm Copyright Act’s “Making Available” Right http://t.co/G3T0a7pQ4n -> Net neutrality gets a kick in the teeth | ZDNet http://t.co/NIVsYzOVum -> Oracle suit against third party maintenance contractor ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Services immobiliers Diane Bisson inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
C-Map USA Inc., 2013 FCA 63 Oakcraft Homes Inc v Ecklund, 2013 CanLII 41981 (ON SCSM) Pelchat c. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
Concluding there was ample evidence that Walmart was a joint employer of the workers at its warehouse in Mira Loma, California, a federal district court rejected the retailer’s motion for summary judgment on the workers’ FLSA and wage and related claims under state law (Carrillo v Schneider Logistics Trans-Loading and Distribution, Inc, January 14, 2014, Snyder, C). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 7:49 am by Joy Waltemath
However, because her vague assertion that she needed time off to determine why she was falling asleep was not sufficient to put the employer on notice that she had a serious medical condition requiring FMLA leave, the appeals court affirmed summary judgment as to this claim (Spurling v C&M Fine Pack, Inc, January 13, 2014, Kanne, M). [read post]