Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 4101 - 4120 of 8,256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2014, 7:04 am by The Rotolo Law Firm
Ricci transferred to Temple University in Philadelphia, PA, and returned to court asking that her parents be forced to pay her tuition, which now amounts to $26,000 a year.(1) In hearing the case, the judge referred to Newburgh v Arrigo, the 1982 State Supreme Court case that decided divorced parents are responsible for providing college educations for their children, and ordered Ms. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
Earlier this year, after the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the facial validity of fee-shifting bylaws in the case of ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 11:10 am by Steve Kalar
  (One for each dollar of his special assessment, on the sole reversed count).United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
McDuffie (f/k/a Stanley Roberson and Stanley Battle), and Jilapuhn, Inc. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
Although Google and Yahoo Argentina won the Da Cunha case and may have the momentum for change, they face many more battles from unhappy private citizens. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
On the interpretive front, the canonical Supreme Court rendering of the executive branch’s interpretive discretion is found in Chevron v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 11:58 am by Dan Ernst
Mary Ziegler (credit)Mary Ziegler, Florida State University College of Law, has posted three recent or forthcoming articles:No Such Thing as Race: Exploring the Past and Future of Affirmative Action after SchuetteOn the surface, Schuette v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:22 pm by Family Law Attorneys
Custodial Parents Moving AwayAfter a divorce or a custody battle, it is not uncommon for one of the ex-spouses to choose to move away from the place where the couple made their home. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]