Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 4101 - 4120 of 16,756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2019, 4:50 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
”[1] The asserted legal authority for these PLI warrants’[2] was SCA § 2703(c)(1)(A). [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:37 pm by Lara
  Annual membership in the co-op is $15 and it provides a 10% discount on all items in the store, which means it pays for itself usually on your first visit. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
To begin with, search engines are likely not engaged in commercial activities, at least for the purposes of section 4(1)(a) of PIPEDA. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
Moore, Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 56.40[1][c] (2011 ed.) [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
This means that if, in the event of bankruptcy, my other debts are discharged, I will probably still have to pay this loan in full.Id. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Furthermore, because Kaspersky qualifies as an “organizer of the dissemination of information on the Internet” under Article 10. 1 of Federal Law No. 149-FZ, it is required to provide the FSB with metadata (as of July 1, 2018), and is also required to provide Russian officials with decryption keys for its data transmissions. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 3:54 pm by Giles Peaker
And under ‘Continuing to occupy during possession proceedings’: Mr X’s s.21 notice to quit was due to expire on 1 July 2014. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm by Russell Jackson
  She's basically a means of transportation to a restaurant or bar, and has never been out of the immediate environs of the Peconic Bay, Gardiner's Bay, and Long Island Sound. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Monica Goyal
Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293, 301 (1946) (Howey), commonly known as the “Howey Test”. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:54 am
  Federal courts have held that a motion under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedureis the appropriate way to raise a claim that the statute of limitations has run, which means the civil cause of action can no longer be brought. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 10:10 am by Andrew Delaney
Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 12:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
” She noted in that regard that Impac had asserted against the co-defendant in the action – that is, Impac’s E&O insurer – that the underlying claims do arise out of the provision of professional services. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 5:10 pm
I am using "interpretation" in a broader sense, as referring to the activity whereby at least one meaning is attributed to linguistic signs. [read post]
All of which raises the question: Can you tamper with a witness by means of public tweets and media interviews? [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 5:45 pm
" In re Donaldson Co., 16 F.3d 1189, 1195 (Fed. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
Due to the peculiar circumstances of the Cuban trade embargo and the OCAS refusal for continued registration, the only option Pernod had left was to turn to the false advertising provision in section 43(a)(1)(B) (previous post). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Boundary crossing: sharing research w/community at large v. within the pharma co. [read post]