Search for: "California v. Force"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 6,450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2013, 4:34 am
Cutting off benefits after two years means that officers have less time to recover, which can effectively "force them out of the job and onto a disability retirement," thus forcing these people onto the public disability roles.There are many scientific studies regarding disability status and return to work.If a claimant isn't back to work after two years of being off work, they aren't returning.That's pretty much the bottom line.Time to move that person to the permanent disability… [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:57 am
Doe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In 1971, he moved to California, where he worked as an emergency room doctor. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 6:17 am
California Rep. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
The other case, City of Upland v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
A Counter-Example: Miranda v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
In Pinnacle Museum v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:12 am
App. 4th 174, and Fitz v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:12 am
App. 4th 174, and Fitz v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In a 1950 California case, State Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
You do not need a username or password to use the site, but if you download an article you are forced to click on a link that says "Acccept JSTOR's Terms and Conditions and Proceed to PDF." [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
You do not need a username or password to use the site, but if you download an article you are forced to click on a link that says "Acccept JSTOR's Terms and Conditions and Proceed to PDF." [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
Rounds, 686 F.3d 889 (8th Cir. en banc 2012).The confusion caused by this unexpected constitutionalization of the doctor-patient relationship is exemplified by two recent cases in the Northern District of California: Welch v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 1:19 pm
See American Road & Transportation Builders Association v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
” Because the debt ceiling could actually force the government to default on its obligations, its existence raises serious questions—questions that would not be raised if the debt ceiling were not on the books—about whether the government will pay its debts—in full, and on time—as required by law. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:04 pm
In opposing it on the BMG v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 1:40 pm
California Coastal Commission, in 1987, and Scalia was part of a five-Justice majority in the 1994 case of Dolan v. [read post]
