Search for: "Case"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 1,079,715
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2015, 8:15 pm
., December 10, 2015) (affirming denial of disability insurance benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 6:39 pm
., April 6, 2017) (declining to disturb a labor commission denial of permanenttotal disability benefits because the decision was supported by substantial evidence)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:23 pm
., July 20, 2016) (affirming denial ofreview of ALJ determination that Ray was not impaired, as Ray failed to showany basis for reversal)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 9:19 pm
., September 14, 2015) (affirming denial of Smith’s application for disability benefits and supplemental security income)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 6:39 pm
(U.S. employer), because of foreign employer Mahalaxmi's failure to establish that Mahalaxmi and Karats are "affiliates")*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 1:09 pm
., April 4, 2016) (reversing judgment in favor of Commissioner because the ALJ failed to properly evaluate consulting psychologist's opinion)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 10:28 pm
., April 13, 2016) (affirming dismissal of plaintiffs' claim for breach of fiduciary duty)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:48 pm
., May 23, 2016) (affirming dismissal for failure to state a claim because Kerkhoff failed to challenge some of the district court’s rationales for the order of dismissal)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:42 pm
., December 6, 2016) (affirming the SEC's disciplinary suspension of McCune (resulting in his being 'permitted to resign' from his employment) because he failed to ‘observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade’)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 11:15 pm
., April 13, 2017) (affirming denial of benefits because evidence supported credibility determination, medical opinions were properly weighed, and Thomas's claim of disabling pain was adequately evaluated)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
21 May 2016, 2:51 am
., May 9, 2016) (affirming ALJ determination that Smith was not disabled)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:55 pm
In every case, the facts of the specific incident guide that essential last 10% of advice and counsel unique to that case. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:53 am
In this case, the Kalamazoo court did not make an inquiry on the record. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:40 am
Here are the cases cited in this month's edition of the Reinsurance Review. [read post]
17 May 2023, 12:32 pm
Such cases are often caused by medical negligence which allows the child’s family to seek legal damages. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 7:03 am
These are not the kind of case that can be trusted to just any law firm. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 6:58 pm
Two of the orders impact criminal cases. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 7:03 am
These are not the kind of case that can be trusted to just any law firm. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 am
Establishing Liability in Nursing Home Abuse Cases in CA One of the primary challenges in nursing home abuse cases is establishing liability. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 10:15 am
In the case, CFPB v. [read post]
