Search for: "Crawford" Results 4101 - 4120 of 6,151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2009, 5:48 am
Tax Prof Bridget Crawford (Pace) has prepared a faculty scholarship ranking by recent SSRN downloads (following Brian Leiter's methodology) of the law schools ranked 23-100 in U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 3:09 am
Bridget Crawford has a fascinating post at Feminist Law Professors regarding ranking law schools using SSRN downloads (here). [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:46 pm
Court decided that reports of state forensic drug lab analysts stating that material seized by police and connected to defendant was cocaine of certain quantity were inadmissible since they violated defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him.An earlier Court ruling in Crawford v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
Though the column provides some quotations from the dissent, I will here give readers some more, from both sides of the fence:Majority: "Respondent and the dissent advance a potpourri of analytic arguments in an effort to avoid this rather straightforward application of our holding in Crawford. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:31 am
Massachusetts, in which the Court held that reports of laboratory tests were “testimonial” under Crawford v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:14 am
[How's that Crawford objection to the jail records working out for you, now?] [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 10:21 am
LEXIS 4734 (June, 25, 2009), the Court unremarkably extended the reach of Crawford v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 3:48 am
  Last week’s big decisions were the application of Crawford to scientific reports, which I discussed on Friday, and the school strip search case. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:20 am
The defense objected to the evidence, since under the former Supreme Court case of Crawford v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 9:50 am by Kevin W Frye
"  The Supreme Court based Melendez-Diaz on its previous ruling in Crawford v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
”   Crawford overruled Roberts, so those decisions aren’t of much signficance. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm by Richard D. Friedman
That, says the Court, is just an invitation to return to the pre-Crawford regime of Roberts. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:54 pm by Matt Cameron
Massachusetts [PDF] was released earlier today as a followup to its critically-acclaimed performance in Crawford v. [read post]