Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 4,551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
Weil V. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 8:25 pm
Cir. 1993))); see also id. at 1369 ("[C]orroboration is required of any witness whose testimony alone is asserted to invalidate a patent, regardless of his or her level of interest. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
C. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:54 pm
The IPKat is grateful to his readers for providing him with further information on the reference to the European Court of Justice by the Cour de Cassation, France, of Case C-235/09 DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA (noted by a very tired Kat at the end of a long day here). [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 11:23 am
Hosp. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:12 am
" Howsam v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:28 pm
In today’s case (Petojevic v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:38 am
In Boulis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 9:26 am
V. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 4:32 am
LEXIS 69665 (D. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 11:24 pm
(…) “seditious intention” includes an intention i. to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the person of Her Majesty, her Heirs or successors, or the Governor-General or the Cabinet or the administration of the Government of Sierra Leone as by law established; or ii. to excite citizens of Sierra Leone or other residents in Sierra Leone to attempt to procure the alteration, otherwise than by lawful means, of any other matter in… [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:00 am
" § 8-17.10 (c). [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 11:22 pm
" Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 801(c). [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
C-1-07-317, 2009 U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 8:14 pm
In B.S. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 8:58 am
He was concerned about his recent communication with a member of the clergy from whom he'd sought spiritual advice. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 4:22 pm
Griffiths v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
LEXIS 61648 (D. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Supp. 2d 184 (D. [read post]
