Search for: "Light v. United States" Results 4101 - 4120 of 11,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2014, 1:37 am by Amy Howe
At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Hera Arsen covers yesterday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
See Brief for Petitioners 27, Reply Brief 16; Brief for Respondents 43; see also Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12–13.Teva Pharma. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
Brief Introduction: On July 1, 2024, the Western District of Louisiana ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in the case, State of Louisiana et al. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 8:28 am by Dennis Crouch
  According to the court, these Judges are “principal officers” and thus must be appointed by the President of the United States (rather than merely the head of the Commerce Dep’t). [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 12:31 pm by Josh Blackman
As of this morning, the President of the United States is subject to an order imposing terms on which he must admit individuals to the Oval Office and other restricted spaces. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:57 am by Matthew Bush
Brief of the United StatesReply of petitioner In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:44 am
  The Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaim was therefore granted.The Court did not resolve a parallel ground for the Motion to Dismiss: whether North Carolina still recognizes a claim for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty in light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:57 am
"; and "Finally, we conclude that the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 11:06 am by Eugene Volokh
United States citizens, whether inside or outside of United States territory, possess First Amendment rights. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:40 pm
June 30, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concluded that the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act’s (“Reform Act”) safe harbor provision, 15 U.S.C. [read post]