Search for: "Little v State" Results 4101 - 4120 of 23,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2009, 4:41 am
This had been an open question here.In United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:41 pm
In both VCG and the other case lawyers are looking to, Merrill Lynch v. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 9:18 pm
I have little doubt that Judge Taylor's willingness to face the merits in ACLU v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:40 pm by Fiona de Londras
While this might not usually be a matter of surprise in the State Department report, the fact that the European Court of Human Rights handed down its important decision in A, B & C v Ireland in December makes it a strange omission. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:45 pm by Brad
State, 106 Md.App. 145, 664 A.2d 60 (1995). [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron and Laura Dooley
 According to Justice Alito, “We have long recognized that the Constitution restricts a State’s power to reach out and regulate conduct that has little if any connection with the State’s legitimate interests. [read post]
17 May 2021, 11:01 am by Amy Howe
The case decided by the court on Monday, Edwards v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:09 pm
Ventura County Superior Court Judge Kevin McGee* got a little big for his britches recently. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Town of Greece v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:13 am
Here at EFF, we did a little bit of both. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is docketed there as Hornbeck Offshore Services, Inc., v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:33 am by Shea Denning
So I was a little surprised when the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit explained earlier this summer that the Supreme Court determined more than thirty years ago in South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:34 am
Supreme Court's refusal on September 28 to grant a stay requested in Valle v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 6:05 am by James Romoser
At the Brennan Center, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy examines how political donations in state attorney general elections may be influencing some of the Republican attorneys general who are suing to dismantle the Affordable Care Act in California v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
The Court found Congress's purpose in enacting the NSPA was to `assist the States' efforts to foil the “roving criminal,” whose movement across state lines. [read post]