Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 4,575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2009, 2:03 pm
In today's case (Forstved v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 8:20 pm
Whether such reports satisfy a scientific standard of scrutiny or can withstand Daubert (Lanigan for us) challenges is another story, of course. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 10:52 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:45 am
/**/ Flagstar Bank, FSB v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:13 pm
The court in Brabham v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:54 am
Last year, as noted in this post, a federal district court rejected in US v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:31 am
So the California Supreme Court’s 2004 decision (Gates v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 10:06 am
Graceway Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 7:02 pm
Lola Cars Int'l Limited v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
The legislature may choose to adjust or clarify the precise point of valuation, and over the years it has enacted legislation to do that. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm
The circuit court relied on the balancing standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Pike v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:55 am
Shadur's opinion in Radke v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:18 am
Boulukos v. 213 P.A.S., L.L.P. (2004) involved a 38 year old man who sustained fractures in the talus of each ankle with bone fragments – almost the precise injuries ruled on in Conway. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
The case is Jones v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 4:01 am
Cohen v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:01 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:55 pm
Check the NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
The response in CA v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 8:01 am
State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:51 pm
Statistical confidence intervals / sampling – the use of statistics as a way to bolster process defensibility is starting to come to maturity and in the future I think that detailed precision, recall and other statistical indicates will play a large role in e-discovery defensibility. [read post]
