Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
“Fraud on the market” isn’t a state-law claim. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:23 am
¶18. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
Doe, supra, ¶;¶ 34-40. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
¶ 27. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:11 pm
" 2011 IL 110920 ¶ 29. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
Supermarkets, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:35 am
See Holmes v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:19 am
State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 12:21 pm
In December 2011, the court dismissed the state’s Donnelly Act treble damages claims on behalf of New York consumers and non-state public entities; dismissed its Donnelly Act claims on behalf of non-state public entities, such as political subdivisions, local entities, and public authorities; and granted Intel’s motion for partial summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds (2011-2 Trade Cases ¶77,711, 2011-2 Trade Cases… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
The individual conscience is free to accept such dictated law, but the State, if its people are to be free, has the burdensome duty of thinking for itself. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:47 am
This Court, in the case of Bihar State Mineral Development Corporation v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm
The VCLT rules of treaty interpretation were expressly applied to dispute settlement by the ICJ in the 1994 case of Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v Chad), and then by the AB in the 1996 case of United States – Standards of Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline as: ‘the customary rules of interpretation of public international law. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
He had no difficulty in deciding that some of the voicemails would be “commercial information” according to the definition, and, moreover (at para 45) “that, as a matter of both principle and practice, non-commercial confidential information is within the ambit of the definition, because of the words 'or other intellectual property' ” Mr Mulcaire did not even prevail in relation to non-confidential messages, with MR stating (at… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
Othman v Secretary of State for the Home Department , 6 February 2012 – read judgment Angus McCullough QC appeared for Abu Qatada as his Special Advocate in this bail hearing. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:17 pm
White v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
Further, a conforming interpretation necessarily applies retrospectively" [para.73]. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:40 am
In its decision on the case Johannes Gerrit Cornelis van Schaik v Hoge Raad der Nederlanden in Para 21 the Court has ruled that: ...Article 4 of the directive further provides that the roadworthiness tests, within the meaning of the directive, are to be carried out by the State or by bodies or establishments designated and directly supervised by the State. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:05 pm
The International Court of Justice has issued its judgment in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:01 pm
In Gasayev v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:59 am
Smith in Supp. of Opp’n. to Mot. to Compel Arbitration at ¶ 5. [read post]
