Search for: "People v. Profit"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 4,434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
” Thus, writes Bluntschli: even if the reprinting of a work by a third person, without the authorisation of its author, were not to cause financial loss to the latter and were perhaps even to secure him profits, this would still be a violation of the author’s rights, for no one has the right to make the author speak to the public against his will, that is, to expose a part of his personality, his name, and his author’s honour to the community. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:31 am
The evils of health care fraud are many – it undermines the judgment of health care professionals, deprives people of the treatment that they need, and, in many cases, can put patients’ health and safety at risk. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 5:48 am
In 2014, in Valent v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:44 pm
The ULD dismissed the complaint stating (according to the CJEU decision) that the education company “had made an active and deliberate contribution to the collection by Facebook of personal data relating to visitors to the fan page, from which it profited by means of the statistics provided to it by Facebook” [17]. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 5:48 am
In 2014, in Valent v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Bush’s signature initiatives, and his version of the gag rule specifically exempted HIV/AIDS funding because it was understood organizations providing prevention, care, or treatment to people with HIV/AIDS could not adequately function under the gag rule’s restrictions. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
It’s true that CFPB v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
– The Brexit’s impact on English corporations having their central administration in Germany On 23rd of June 2016, the people of the United Kingdom voted in a referendum against the UK staying in the European Union. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Case law The Spencer v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:22 am
"—Abstract.Mikhail V. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Magistrates in the Tang Dynasty in early China were also eager to avoid the formal legal system and so encouraged parties to resolve disputes amicably between themselves.[9] In contrast, the United States’ patent law can be seen in the case of Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:18 am
Note that the argument isn’t that union members should receive an accounting of their union’s finances, a point that I think most people (including me) agree with. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Crawford v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm
Here you are thinking you’re helping because a physical ticket mailed out to people could be lost, burned, copied, etc. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 11:16 am
Phillips, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 10:58 am
Filed as U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Nor does the consumer’s lack of understanding have to be reasonable, and there is no required threshold number of people who lacked understanding.[24] Further, a consumer may have a lack of understanding even if he or she is generally aware that a particular consequence may follow—e.g., he or she may be aware of the consequence, but may not understand either the magnitude or likelihood of a particular risk.[25] Evidence of lack of understanding can include direct evidence,… [read post]
