Search for: "People v. Waits" Results 4101 - 4120 of 5,500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 5:26 am by Susan Brenner
Department of Health and Human Services reports that 80,000 to 90,000 people were waiting for a kidney or liver transplant in each of the years 2006, 2007, and 2008, during which [he] conducted his liver4you.org scheme. . . . [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
That was the question the 6th Circuit wrestled with in their decision last week in Muniz v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:03 pm by Tessa Shepperson
I read with interest today of Grant Shapps plans to make it quicker and easier for social landlords to evict people for anti-social behaviour. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm by Donna Eng
Some people who have been reading this blog know that I have been waiting for the decision in Evans v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
  In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
*Before I go further, let me explain that I use the term “Obamacare” simply because people colloquially refer to it that way – probably because it’s easier to say than “PPACA,” “Affordable Care Act,” or any other more cognate. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:40 am by SHG
  As in, "intent" means, wait for it, "intent. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:22 am
They contend that she had the train leave earlier than she should have and that if she'd waited Cameron may have been able to get back on the platform. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:13 pm by Joe Koncelik
  These delays had given hope that EPA may wait to choose a revised standard until after the election. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 11:38 am by Andres
Topiary’s Twitter feed has only one entry just before his arrest, which paraphrases V for Vendetta. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:33 am by Kristina Araya
In an opinion authored by Justice Markman, the Supreme Court held, in People v Huston, No. 141312 (July 26, 2011), that the trial court properly assessed 15 points under OV 10, which is appropriate when a defendant has “engaged in predatory conduct to exploit a vulnerable victim. [read post]