Search for: "STATE v KENNEDY"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 7,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2009, 12:11 am
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:00 pm
In its opinion in Kentucky Retirement Systems v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:33 pm
I have previously commented on Sorrell v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
Several patent-related cases, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:13 am
Given the implications of the rule for which the petitioner in Martinez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
What's so bad about "business method" patents? Small PR firms "goosed" by a patent on press releases
21 Jul 2010, 5:52 pm
" The dilemma Kennedy faces is a smaller-scale version of the one faced constantly by, among others, large Internet retailers, which submitted an amicus brief [PDF] in the Bilski v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 6:08 pm
Kennedy, 13 M.J. 465 (1982) (mem.); United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:11 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:34 am
As importantly, in Gonzales v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 6:46 pm
In Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:34 am
As he put it in a concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2025, 7:31 am
In one of those cases, Carson v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:52 pm
One key question from Justice Kennedy has led many to speculate that Ms. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:42 am
The causation element requires a showing that the injured party “‘would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence'” (Bells v Foster, 83 AD3d at 877, quoting Kennedy v H. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:46 am
But the Court’s affirmance in Lexmark was matched by a unanimous reversal in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm
Shah whether he agreed that under United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm
United States or Printz v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:16 am
The United States Supreme Court is, when it comes to technology, almost completely ignorant. [read post]
