Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 4101 - 4120 of 5,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 7:32 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 16-402 Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell-phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell-phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 10:35 am
Unlike certain exceptions to the warrant requirement, where the burden of demonstrating that an exception applies is allocated to the Commonwealth, here the defendant "must bear the threshold burden of showing that a warrantless search or seizure occurred. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:53 pm by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
The court also did not accept the state’s argument that the Hailstorm constituted a valid search for the purpose of triggering the Fourth Amendment’s unreasonable-search-and-seizure protections. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:53 pm by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
The court also did not accept the state’s argument that the Hailstorm constituted a valid search for the purpose of triggering the Fourth Amendment’s unreasonable-search-and-seizure protections. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 1:52 pm
This information was used in later search warrant applications. [read post]
On the other hand, the Fourth Amendment gives citizens the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:27 pm
Georgia relented and consented to the seizure and search of the home computer, on which police later discovered more child pornography. [read post]
On the other hand, the Fourth Amendment gives citizens the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Jeff Welty
Espinoza, 641 F.2d 153 (4th Cir. 1981) (“The search warrant having been a valid one, it follows that Agent Dauwalder had the right to be in the positions which afforded him a plain view of the scenes photographed at J-E’s warehouse. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Jeff Welty
Espinoza, 641 F.2d 153 (4th Cir. 1981) (“The search warrant having been a valid one, it follows that Agent Dauwalder had the right to be in the positions which afforded him a plain view of the scenes photographed at J-E’s warehouse. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  “Even if the detention were at some point illegal, the existence of the warrant and the search pursuant to arrest on that warrant was valid. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:47 am by SHG
The plaintiff argues that monitoring a person’s movements requires a search warrant. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:11 pm by Zoraida Fernandez
A broad search warrant authorization must be viewed in the context of the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:47 pm
Yes, they still needed a warrant to enter, to search for drugs.So, the essence of S-431, DEMANDS from the RSO something which is in his home, and if s/he doesn't give it willingly, they will be prosecuted for violating the registry law. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Jessica Rich
  The amendment would further require that, if the interception, compelled production, or physical search and seizure of information would require a warrant, court order, or subpoena under law, DOD may not obtain that information from a third party without obtaining the warrant, court order, or subpoena. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
’ The State explains that the trial court `effectively grant[ed] the defendant a search warrant and order[ed] the State to execute that warrant,’ which, according to the State, `destroyed [the complainant's] right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:32 pm by Colin Miller
The Nix Court’s point was that while the Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, the remedy of the exclusionary rule (excluding the cocaine from trial) is not necessary when the fruit of the unreasonable search/seizure (the cocaine) would inevitably have been discovered because there isn’t enough of a need to deter police misconduct in such cases. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Summers (that police may detain a suspect incident to execution of a search warrant) is limited to the immediate vicinity of the premises to be searched, and does not apply when a suspect is detained at a point beyond any reasonable understanding of the immediate vicinity of the premises in question. [read post]