Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 23,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 2:43 pm
Missouri State of Missouri, et al., v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 9:56 am
The United States Supreme Court Monday issued its opinion in Denezpi v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:58 pm
State of Mississippi v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:13 am
The California Supreme Court today in a much-anticipated decision, People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 11:30 am
Singh v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:17 am
Nokia's (and Ericsson's) refusal to license component makers is in clear violation of CJEU case law (Huawei v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 12:09 pm
It is widely known that a country is often hugely influenced by what happens in a neighboring state. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 7:29 am
Cahill et al v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Wolf gives any evidence of having read, even while stating my opinions for me), and I did not conflate them in my interview with Ms. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
And yes, I know your three word response will be "Plessy v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 10:37 pm
Huawei "merely" states that the UK court "can" take a Chinese FRAND determination with respect to the Chinese market, but "does not have to. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 5:42 am
Recall that a few years ago, the Court held in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Indeed, particularly in recent decades, the law of defamation has evolved to provide more adequate protection for freedom of expression on matters of public interest”. [19] She discerned a general trend towards revising the law of defamation to provide more protection for freedom of expression which could be observed in England, Australia, New Zealand, United States, Germany and the European Court of Human Rights: “What is of interest for my purposes is not so much the… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: The Supreme Court Is No Safe Haven for Abortion Rights
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:33 am
As recently as a few months ago, as state supreme courts around the country were turning back similar arguments, a California ruling for same-sex couples still seemed a long shot. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
Yesterday President Donald Trump announced new restrictions on entry into the United States by nationals from eight countries; the government has asked the Supreme Court to order briefing addressing the effect of the new order on the entry-ban case now pending before the court. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 3:22 pm
Once again the issue of an applicant's eligibility for benefits has come before the courts in Sylwia Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1310. [read post]
