Search for: "State v. English" Results 4101 - 4120 of 6,361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 10:54 am by Jamison Koehler
 As the Massachusetts Supreme Court put it so well in Goodridge v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:00 am by Barry Eagar
Jockey International Inc v Darren Wilkinson [2010] ATMO 22Jockey is the registered owner of a number of trade marks relating to underwear featuring JOCKEY as a component. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
    Swap the non-distinctive words and add a house mark: not enough to avoid conflictWEALTHSMART v UBS SMARTWEALTH O/094/18 UK opposition (February 2018)For those involved in brand clearance, this is an illustration of the state of the Thomson Life principle in action before the UKIPO. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Steve Gottlieb
Smith English only Environment Environment Environmental justice epidemics Epperson v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:38 pm by Michael C. Dorf
We wrote a brief together in Elane Photography v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
A familiar sight for lawyersinvolved in TVCatchup suitsITV Broadcasting Limited, ITV 2 Limited, ITV Digital Channels Limited, Channel Four Television Corporation, 4 Ventures Limited, Channel 5 Broadcasting Limited and ITV Studios Limited v TVCatchup Limited (in administration), TVCatchup (UK) Limited and Media Resources Limited (a Mauritian company) [2015] EWCA Civ 204 is the latest development in the long-running copyright litigation saga which is usually known by its shorter name of ITV… [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:31 pm by Ronald Mann
In a rare moment for the Roberts Court, the opinion in Star Athletica v Varsity Brands addressed that question broadly and categorically, passing up every opportunity to narrow or confine its ruling. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots SEC Sanctions Investment Firm for Inadequate Cybersecurity and Identity Theft Prevention Policies Posted by Sabastian V. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:41 am by Andy Grewal
As discussed in a prior post, the Sixth Circuit in Whirlpool v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 11:05 am by Ronald Mann
That provision states: “In any civil action under [the Copyright Act], the court in its discretion may allow the recovery of full costs by or against any party …. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
This post follows up yesterday's about questions asked by the Supreme Court Justices during oral argument in the Hall v. [read post]