Search for: "State v. King"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 5,381
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2011, 6:13 pm
The Western District sent it back to King County Superior Court — from which the case had been removed — finding plaintiff’s causes of action sound in state court, the court plaintiff had selected. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:32 am
In Bergamo v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
That's unusual, as federal courts like to defer to the evidentiary findings of state courts. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
Walker, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law How might a new U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 2:51 pm
Pagones (and Judge of the Surrogate’s Court) in Antony T. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:00 am
In Kentucky v, King police observed a crack cocaine sale outside of an apartment house. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 8:54 am
The case is titled Guru Denim, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Overmyer v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:31 am
Court papers filed by YSL in New York states, “red outsoles are a commonly use ornamental design feature in footwear, dating as far back as the red shoes worn by King Louis XIV in the 1600s and the ruby red shoes that carried Dorothy home in The Wizard of Oz. [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:12 pm
Earlier today, the Mississippi Supreme Court released its opinion in Allen v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:30 am
In Lopez v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:25 am
Thereafter, Utopia moved in the New York State Supreme Court, Kings County, for a stay of the arbitration. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Earlier this year in Sabow v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 2:55 pm
Both awards were affirmed on appeal in Barrett v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
For example, Teachout points to the Foreign Emoluments Clause (“FEC”), which provides: [N]o Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them [i.e., the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:52 am
Alok Gupta (thanks) kindly pointed out the judgment in Om Prakash v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:46 pm
For example, Teachout points to the Foreign Emoluments Clause (“FEC”), which provides: [N]o Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them [i.e., the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:41 am
Anders Walker explores how three moderate Southern governors formulated masked resistance in the wake of Brown v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:37 am
”Parrish, a partner at the Washington, D.C. office of international law firm King & Spalding and a member of its national appellate and strategic counseling practice group, was involved with the landmark Coleman v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant were based in the United States. [read post]
