Search for: "State v. Mai" Results 4101 - 4120 of 133,139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Earlier this month, I blogged about Chancellor McCormick’s decision in Sjunde AP-fonden v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:54 pm
The license may or may not be valid, and EA and Mr. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am by rhapsodyinbooks
As you know by now, in the opinion issued in Shelby County v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 6:55 am by Broc Romanek
Proposed Delaware Law Amendments May Impact Deal Structures Here's news from Greenberg Traurig's Cliff Neimeth: Legislative amendments have been introduced to the Delaware State Bar Association (Section on Corporation Laws) which, if adopted, could have a meaningful structural impact on two-step transactions (i.e., acquisitions effected pursuant to a first-step tender or exchange offer followed by a back end merger). [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Luvene, 118 Wn.2d 826, 844-5, 827 P.2d 1374 (1992) (citizens must be given clear notice of prohibited conduct); and Mays v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:49 am by Barbara Lichman
On June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court sent a long, cold shiver through the ranks of Federal agencies in its landmark decision in the case of Loper Bright v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Holly Hayes
  However, due to the questionable holding of the United States Supreme Court in Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am by John Jascob
In their ongoing court challenge to the rule, regulators from Massachusetts and Montana argued that the SEC’s amendments to Regulation A violate the plain meaning of the Securities Act, overstep the Commission’s delegated authority, and strip investors of valuable state law protections (Lindeen v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
Cartus Corporation v Siddell, 8 May 2014 (Sir David Eady) SPA v TAS, 8 May 2014 (Tugendhat J). [read post]