Search for: "State v. So"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 117,764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2023, 5:07 am
Sulier v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
So this process is producing results. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Harrow v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:33 am
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
After all, Atlas Roofing Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:36 pm
Servs., Inv. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
Case law even tells us that the writing can take many forms — Andrews v McKim, 355 So.3d 957, 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023): Email. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:05 pm
—Mark Twain 1Theodore v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:12 pm
The justices have agreed to decide the following issue: “Whether district courts, in determining whether the due process clause requires a state or local government to provide a post-seizure probable-cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial-forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should apply the “speedy trial” test employed in United States v. $8,850 and Barker v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:08 pm
” City of Troy v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
Wallace (1939), and United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:07 am
Res. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:49 am
Days after I wrote about the Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) role for litigants here in the R.B. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
MacNeil contends doing so violates the Supreme Court’s “ordinary remand rule” established in I.N.S. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
The case, Dada v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am
Props., LLC v Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., 195 AD3d 1502, 1502-1503; Mazzurco v PII Sam, LLC, 153 AD3d 1341, 1342; Desiderio v Geico Gen. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
FAMILY COURT LACKED JURISDICTIONAlthough his kid lived in Guatemala with the child’s mom since birth, when the two come to the United States to visit, the father refused to return the child to the mom.When the dad asked the Queens County Family Court to exercise “emergency jurisdiction,” and filed a custody petition, the court ultimately determined that it “lacked jurisdiction,” and directed that the child be released to the mother so that he could… [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:45 pm
McElrath v. [read post]
