Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2022, 11:35 am
It is ill-equipped to handle how copyright-protected works are shared today. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 10:58 am
These are two consumer protective facets of the Medicaid program that assist not only individuals but help to ensure providers are not left with uncompensated care costs. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ICANN postpones limitless domain plan (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (The Trademark Blog) ECJ: Database infringements depend on taking, not usage, of data: Apis-Hristovich EOOD v Lakorda AD (Out-Law) (IPKat) Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation sets up its own Bittorent tracker (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:25 pm
(Note to Reader: No, I am really not making this up.) [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm
" T. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 1:48 pm
Weren't these the same Progressives who had run wailing into the cobble-stoned streets sans torches and pitchforks following this Court's rulings in Bush v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:33 am
Well, the court in Delarosa v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 3:00 am
Code § 17200, that seeks to protect both consumers and competitors from any unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business act or practice. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
(IPRoo), (Australian Patent Law), (Managing Intellectual Property), Global Global - General Intellectual property business models: (IP Thinktank), Kicking own goal by attempting to restrain (internet) publication: (IP Thinktank), New Geneva think tank IQsensato features developing nation research on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO releases 2008 World Intellectual Property Report: (IP Menu News), Bringing the developed world to heel through the use of IP sanctions:… [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:30 am
[v] (See Exhibit 7) And NBC Universal’s stable of programming, while impressive, is a mere trickle in an ocean of content that consumers can choose from. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:39 am
In particular: Since geographically descriptive terms are not regarded as inherently distinctive, the law requires that they must acquire consumer association or “secondary meaning” for legal protection. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:33 am
Perhaps we can gain some insights on this issue from yesterday's Washington state Supreme Court decision in Rousso v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 9:50 pm
Tanvir, Fulton v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:37 am
Geist claims that website blocking isn’t effective because he isn’t aware “of any study that suggests there’s any significant difference. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:04 am
The ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:25 am
No one is wise enough to craft a polity from the ground up. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:25 am
No one is wise enough to craft a polity from the ground up. [read post]
