Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 8,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 8:39 am
The petitioner argues that, because a complete breakdown in the adversarial process occurred, his claim instead is controlled by United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 1:49 pm
Such a plan discontinuance is something the law would permit Catholic Charities to do; it’s something that many employers across the United States are likely to do; and presumably it would not be prohibited by Catholic Charities’ (or the Diocese’s) religion. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:18 am
The first Tuesday of every November serves as Election Day in New Jersey and across the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
United States, 14-10154, was the lone grant among the relists. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:38 am
While the mark may have achieved some level of fame for Section 2(d) purposes, it was not shown that the mark is "widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source," the standard stated in the dilution statute. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:24 am
United States was, as Evan Lee put it, “The Battle of the Canons,” the first argument in Torres v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
Each of the two petitioners now before us, Treasure State Resource Industry Association and United States Steel Corporation, challenges one of these 29 designations (not meeting its new SO2 standards): the Association attacks the one for part of Yellowstone County, Montana, and U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm
At the time the first allegation of mistreatment was received in January 1977, plaintiffs' parents were receiving counseling under the auspices of Manhattan Family Court, where they were monitored by the Home Advisory Unit and received court [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:23 pm
So when Breyer recounted errors in Robins’s credit report and asked Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (arguing on behalf of the United States in support of Robins) whether, for purposes of deciding this case, Spokeo’s errors would constitute a sufficiently concrete injury to Robins, the Chief Justice quickly countered that “that’s not what the” court of appeals said. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 10:34 am
At least if that Nevada conviction took place in 2009 (as petitioner's did); as of 2013, even in Nevada, such a conviction wouldn't subject you to removal (since the maximum penalty is now 364 days).But since it was in Nevada, and since it was 2009, petitioner gets deported even though he's been in the United States for nearly two decades, and even if he can show, e.g., exceptional hardship to U.S. citizens as a result of his removal. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:04 am
State Crime Victims Bd., 502 U.S. 105, 116 (1991); Brown v. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 5:45 am
The losing mark-seeker has now filed a petition for writ of cert asking: Whether the Fourth Circuit’s holding – that “the expenses of the proceeding” that “shall be paid” by a trademark applicant bringing an action under Section 21(b) include the salaries of attorneys and paralegals employed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office – violates the American Rule. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:05 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 10:29 am
The goal is to promote access to in-state programming. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:37 am
Background The petitioner, Jorge Luna Torres (who refers to himself as George Luna), is a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic and a lawful permanent resident of the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 7:53 am
United States, a forfeiture case being argued the day after this case. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 12:26 pm
During the pendency of petitioner's appeal, the United States Supreme Court decided Johnson . . . 135 S.Ct. 2551 . . . (2015), which held that the Armed Career Criminal Act's (‘ACCA’) so-called residual clause’ definition of a “violent felony” is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
United States, 14-10154, probably returns for a second time. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:50 am
United States, describing the case as “a case about two dueling canons – the ancient rule of the last antecedent, and the newly discovered ‘series-qualifier’ rule, which made its first appearance by name in Justice Scalia’s 2012 book,Reading Law. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
