Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 9,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
The principle that it might be possible to identify concerns from a series of low-level concerns and not only from a catastrophic incident already underpins, for example, the Disclosure and Barring Scheme. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 1:24 pm
In Matter of Gregory S. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:37 pm
It has worldwide popularity and is used as a platform to expose perceived wrongdoing. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 7:49 am
Doss moved for reconsideration, which was granted. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 2:30 pm
§164.308(a)(1)(i) by failing to implement policies and procedures to prevent, detect, contain, and correct security violations, including conducting an accurate and thorough assessment of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of all of the ePHI it holds, and implementing security measures sufficient to reduce risks and vulnerabilities to a reasonable and appropriate level; From January 19, 2013, until March 1, 2014, UMMC violated 45… [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:40 pm
” (Physicians for Human Rights v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 10:45 am
In Dennis v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 6:28 am
____” or “U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:58 am
Gravelle v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 1:44 pm
Zia Shadows, LLC v City of Law Cruces, 2016 WL 3960827 (10th Cir. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
We then address defendant's contention that the trial court should have granted his demurrer.State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:36 am
Additional Resources: Appeals court upholds $3 million verdict in asbestos case, July 10, 2016, The Buffalo News, By Phil Fairbanks More Blog Entries: Grant v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
This brings us to the question of whether sufficient safeguards are in place. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
Jape; Stevo Design v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Infringement - The de minimis principle in quia timet actionsThe de minimis principle has been considered in previous patent authorities (Hoechst v BP [1998], Monsanto v Cargill [2007], Napp v Ratiopharm [2009], Lundbeck v Norpharma [2011]). [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 9:10 am
Specifically, the recreational use statute grants immunity to those who open their land for the general enjoyment of the public. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 10:18 am
The level of damages available to Ms Moreno in this case would be higher if they were calculated using English law rather than Greek law. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:47 am
Ventures, Inc. v. [read post]
