Search for: "Waites v. State"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 12,155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Real Estate v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
The case is Incalza v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:47 am
A 1985 precedent, Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
United States, 434 F.3d 1359, 1368 (Fed. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Instead of waiting to be sued they sued first, asking for a declaratory judgment that Martin’s claims should be denied. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:28 am
The EPA has filed its merits brief in Sackett v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 4:47 am
See Hopson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 9:01 am
In Apotex v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm
We’ll have to wait for the case to move to find out. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:13 am
However, in the recent Chancery decision of inTEAM Associates, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 1:58 pm
Realtek Semiconductor Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:39 pm
In his dissent in yesterday's Boumediene v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 1:12 pm
In a crucial 4-3 decision, in Delisle v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm
Data generally cannot be copyrighted in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
Cooperation in criminal and civil matters in the AFSJ follow different patterns and maybe this is how it should be (I am eagerly waiting to read Dr. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
See White v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 9:08 am
Campbell and James V. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
The laws that apply to generic drugs recently shifted in favor of the manufacturers at the expense of injured consumers in 2011 when the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Pilva, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]
