Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D" Results 4121 - 4140 of 10,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2015, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Problem for US patent system: difficult to reform patent law b/c you have two statutes and two venues. eBay v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 9:16 pm
”Applying the Estate of Young, and Beck Estate decisions as well as the Manitoba Court of Appeal decision in George v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 10:19 am by Elizabeth Kruska
This is not the subject of the case here.The first degree charge has the following elements: a) Defendant; b) Recklessly; c) Caused a family or household member; d) Serious bodily injury.The legislature, in writing the first degree aggravated domestic assault statute, defined “serious bodily injury” as an injury that creates any of the following: a) a substantial risk of death; b) a substantial loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or… [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:26 am by San Antonio Lawyer
(c)  Except as provided by Subsection (e), an offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Further, “the court shall pro rate each parent’s share of reasonable health care expenses not reimbursed or paid by insurance ... in the same proportion as each parent’s income is to the combined parental income” (Domestic Relations Law § 240[1–b] [c][5][v]). [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 9:12 am
(La última había sido la # 5, " ¿Cómo se interpreta una Constitución? [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:59 pm by Jeremy Saland
“E” felonies are punishable by up to four years in prison, “D”, seven years in prison, “C”, fifteen years in prison, and “B” twenty five years in prison. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:59 pm by Jeremy Saland
“E” felonies are punishable by up to four years in prison, “D”, seven years in prison, “C”, fifteen years in prison, and “B” twenty five years in prison. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court unanimously held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Rihanna: High Court decided this was passing off, on the merit of those particular facts, b/c there had been a previous relationship w/Rihanna and Top Shop. [read post]