Search for: "California v. Force"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 6,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2013, 1:40 pm
California Coastal Commission, in 1987, and Scalia was part of a five-Justice majority in the 1994 case of Dolan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:30 am
Perry, the federal challenge to California’s Proposition 8. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:37 pm
Nevertheless, it fell out of favor with potential plaintiffs in 2003, when the California Supreme Court ruled in Intel v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:39 am
In Smith v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
It was evident to the New York court that, given California’s hostility to restrictive covenants, the California action was merely “a preemptive measure undertaken to gain a tactical advantage so as to negate the force and effect of the restrictive covenants, which the parties had freely agreed upon. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
It was evident to the New York court that, given California’s hostility to restrictive covenants, the California action was merely “a preemptive measure undertaken to gain a tactical advantage so as to negate the force and effect of the restrictive covenants, which the parties had freely agreed upon. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 8:23 am
LEXIS 1618 (SD CA, Jan. 2, 2013), a California federal district court dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's complaint that he was given kosher meat that was inedible and so was forced to compromise his Jewish religious beliefs.In Allah v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
California satisfies the requirement for a defendant to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require reappointment of counsel to file a motion for new trial. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 2:47 pm
Every forceful kidnapping -- every single one that meets California's statutory requirements -- results in those harms to the victim.This seems to me a big problem with the majority's analysis. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Water Replenishment District Of Southern California(2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 943: A 1991 groundwater basin judgment provided the legal framework for a later, 2010 declaration of water emergency. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:26 am
In Garvey v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:43 am
Brown v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:32 pm
California, New York v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
Bond v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 9:51 am
CVS CaremarkMen's Journal Beats Lawsuit Alleging Violation of California’s “Shine the Light” Privacy Statute -- Boorstein v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
(Is it possible for the largest state bars to force the hand of legal educators?) [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 8:38 am
In addition, the court found that the employee’s preferred accommodation (not changing the date) would have created an undue hardship by forcing the employer to tread on the religious beliefs of other employees. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 4:15 pm
Although Judge Sammartino quoted Penal Code section 327 and cited to the California case People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
For example, in the famous and controversial case of Rust v. [read post]
