Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 4121 - 4140 of 32,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2014, 6:00 am
Question #8 - GeneralEveryone is telling me that I should apply for DACA because I’m currently eligible. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:47 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Moreover, the definition of a child for these purposes does not cut off at age 21, as it does for H-4 purposes under INA 101(b)(1), 8 U.S.C. 1101(b)(1) . [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
" On its face, §8.01–581.20:1 does not apply to this patient fall case on 2 independent grounds. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
On June 8, the opponent (Bro Morgannwg NHS Trust) filed an appeal. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 1:20 pm
(8) Evidence that the child has been cared for by a de facto custodian, and if the evidence is sufficient, the court shall consider the factors described in section 2.5(b) of this chapter.No, I do not think our statutes make the explicit, clean statement as does Ohio's statute. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
IAC 327 IAC 8-2-1 has been modified a number of times. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 7:04 am
Many monumental experiences will elicit a strong emotional response upon recollection.8. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 7:04 am
Many monumental experiences will elicit a strong emotional response upon recollection.8. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 6:24 am
After screening 2,481 articles, the meta-analysis included 28 international studies (20 case-controlled, 8 cohorts) totaling 9,587 NHL patients. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Robin Kobayashi
These adult workers are sleeping less than 6 hours a day, when the recommended amount of sleep is 7 to 8 hours a day. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
.*** Translation of the French original ***[1.1] Claims 1 of the main request and of auxiliary requests 1 to 3 have been amended by introducing the subject-matter of claims 5, 7, and 8 of the patent as granted (which correspond to original claims 5, 7, and 8). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am by ASAD KHAN
The decision-maker refused to revoke the deportation order and concluded that deportation would not breach ECHR, art 8. [read post]