Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100" Results 4121 - 4140 of 5,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2016, 8:52 am by Douglas A. Berman
In particular, Senator Cotton is 100% right that our national data on the recidivism rates and realities of federal offe [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
  Click for more on this 42-page report    What does this mean to the practice? [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 3:01 pm by Dan Harris
How does the CCP lean on canola companies? [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 12:30 am by Nathan McMurray
These tests essentially boil down to four elements: 1. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
This is because the press maintained then, as it does now, the fiction that it operates underneath the hob-nailed jack boot of the UK law of libel; which I know because I have legalled newsprint, broadcast footage, books etc. for twenty-five years. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information Law Reese v Daines, 20 Misc 3d 1145(A) Justice NeMoyer’s ruling in the Reese case provides summaries of the basic issues and case law involved in satisfying the mandates of New York’s Open Meetings Law (OML) (Public Officers Law § 100 et seq) and its Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), Public Officers Law Section 84 et. seq. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Rather, in each case the court must undertake an analysis that centers on the authority under which the entity was created, the power distribution or sharing model under which it exists, the nature of its role, the power it possesses and under which it purports to act, and a realistic appraisal of its functional relationship to affected parties and constituencies' (Matter of Smith v City Univ. of NY, 92 NY2d 707, 713 [1999])" (Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; see Snyder v Third Dept. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Therefore, the wider dissemination of that information does not fall within the scope of this decision (§16). [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Q: Costs are capped—what does that mean? [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 2:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
During the recently completed July 1 renewal season, t [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am by Danielle Citron
I will not summarize his 100-page argument, which examines many speech areas. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
The safety contract between the Department and Robin S[.] was for placement purposes and does not prevent [the parents] from making changes to the children's placement. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 1:52 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
It does this by enhancing the action of enzymes involved in these metabolic processes. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
To the extent that contract law has let parties decide in whom they want to place business trust, Nike can tell MSCHF thanks but no thanks. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Second, as stated, the rule that there’s no © in works “(1) created by judges and legislators (2) in the course of their judicial and legislative duties,” leaves open what happens if the works are created by lobbyists and then incorporated into law, or if they’re made part of the law like building codes drafted by private parties. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
If user is communicating with third party marketer, can share it with Facebook. [read post]