Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 4121 - 4140
of 5,650
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
On the ground that, vis-a-vis Jeffrey, he's simply getting what he expected. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:39 am
Our right to seclusion vis-à-vis one another and our right to be free from unreasonable searches under the Fourth Amendment are not perfectly on all fours, but the big issues are similar. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:30 pm
What the article does not point out clearly is that China can also quickly put down any hint of dissent and this puts them in a superior position vis-a-vis the trade unions and other civil society. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:07 pm
One would have to argue, I suppose, that there is a conflict underway vis-a-vis Hezbollah, with the domestic authority to participate in the conflict resting on Article II inherent authority to engage in national self-defense. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:32 am
Likewise, the United States Constitution does not require counsel for indigent defendants seeking post-conviction relief. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
Although this list is not exhaustive, it does deal with some of the more common and prominent concerns. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
There was no reason to exclude cases which fell within the ambit of the literal words of Reg 8(2)vi) In the present case, the review officer had rejected the original decision that Mr M was intentionally homeless, but confirmed the decision that Mr M did not have priority need. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
There was no reason to exclude cases which fell within the ambit of the literal words of Reg 8(2)vi) In the present case, the review officer had rejected the original decision that Mr M was intentionally homeless, but confirmed the decision that Mr M did not have priority need. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
Since the suit for partition was instituted only in the year 1991, after coming into force of the AP Amendment Act, 1986, the decision of the Supreme Court, granting equal share to the daughters in the coparcenery property along with the sons in the family IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.BUT THE REASONING GIVEN BY THE SUPREME COURT FOR ARRIVING AT THE SAID DECISION APPEARS TO BE WRONG FOR THE REASONS:According to classical Hindu Law, some of the circumstances in which partition can take… [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:57 am
Courts as well often interpret federal law in ways that favor judicial power vis a vis the other branches. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 2:21 am
Thereby an approach comparable to Article VI(3) of the European Convention may be a suitable solution. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Fairness in Numbers: A Comment on AT&T v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:07 am
What is the GSTT or Generation Skipping Transfer Tax? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:33 am
[vi]7. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
Although this is “so framed as to have, as nearly as practicable, the same effect as Art 57 (see s.130(7) of the Act)”, “capable” does convey a flavour of concreteness about what the invention must be for. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:02 am
Title VII, of course, does provide for attorneys' fees. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:51 pm
There is an unjust and gaping hole in the statute: if Defendant ultimately prevails on Plaintiffs' Chapter 480 claim and Plaintiffs' cannot enforce the alleged § 481B-14 violation through any other means, arguably no one will enforce the violation. . . . [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:57 am
The discussion of these questions appears all the more important given that the work of legal history does not only depend on the accuracy of its analytical instruments but that it could offer concepts developed from historic-empirical research to the discourse with other disciplines, especially vis-à-vis the legal sciences. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
But how does this work? [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am
irketi (Afro-IP) Peru INDECOPI shows the way to support an invention (IP tango) Philippines Philippines IP Office: ‘Our meeting is not fostering corporate greed’ (IP Watch) WIPO defends involvement in IP enforcement meeting in the Philippines (IP Watch) New IPR court procedures (IP Komodo) Poland Supreme Administrative Court: Provisions concerning industrial designs refer to user of the design, and not its distributor or seller: II GSK 838/10 (Class 99) Voivodeship… [read post]
