Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 4121 - 4140 of 5,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2011, 2:35 pm by Above the Law
In Part 1 of the Career Center survey results on debt, we reported that 85% of the 3,700 survey respondents have outstanding student loan debt, with more than half of them owing $100,000 or more. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Joe Wallin
(B) LIMITATION BASED ON AMOUNT OF TAX - In the case of a taxable year to which section 26(a)(2) does not apply, the credit allowed under subpart A for any taxable year (determined after application of paragraph (1)) by reason of subparagraph (A) shall not exceed the excess of -- (i) the sum of the regular tax liability (as defined in section 26(b)) plus the tax imposed by section 55, over (ii) the sum of the credits allowable under subpart A (other than this section) and section 27… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
If one was to approve the representative and understand this to be in contradiction with the text of T 828/94 reproduced in the “Case Law” book and, moreover, to J 9/86, and if one was also to assume, as does the representative, that it was possible to rely on the “Case Law” book alone, then the question would arrive as to how the representative would have to deal with such a contradiction in the context of the requirement of “taking ADuCaRC” under A… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:27 am by Stefanie Levine
id=900005498113&slreturn=1&hbxlogin=1. [6] Mark Guetlich, Patent Prosecution Highway-Strategic Considerations and Usefulness, Intellectual Property Owners Committee CLE Conference –Chicago Hilton, (Sept. 16, 2009), available at http://www.ipo.org/AM/Template.cfm? [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
" Indeed, Justice Corbett went on (in paragraph 37), the "constellation of facts" alleged "may well preclude the defendants' affirmative defenses. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
The other interesting brief filed in the case was on behalf of 37 law professors (with a number of notables signing on, including Jim Cox at Duke and John Coffee at Columbia. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:17 am by John L. Welch
P. 37(c)(1) standard, whether the omissions were substantially justified or harmless.There is no requirement that a party notify the Board that it has served expert disclosures. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 2:07 am by Michael Geist
Article 37 (1) (a) . . . to the extent necessary to benefit from the exception. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Chris Jaglowitz
Section 37 Agreement Settlement In a separate case, MPAC and TSCC 1649 entered into a Settlement Agreement whereby the assessment of a daycare unit was reduced from $1,928,000 to $5. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
We have no hesitation in holding that the narrow concepts of `cause of action', `person aggrieved' and individual litigation are becoming obsolescent in some jurisdictions.37. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
  Initially, this was done by reference to Article 8 of the Convention (see Gaskin v United Kingdom (1989) 12 EHRR 36 paras 37, 52; see also McGinley and Egan v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR 1). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:15 am by Stefanie Levine
Preparing oath not a ministerial act Adding a dependent claim to hedge against possible invalidity of original claims does not constitute an error correctible by reissue. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:58 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
  I only register a bill once for each of the above categories, so (for example) a bill that creates 1 felony and 1 misdemeanor-A crime only counts once for each of those two categories, as does a bill that creates 3 felonies and 2 misdemeanor-A crimes.Regular readers know Texas already has 2,383 separate felonies on the books, including 11 involving oysters. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:14 am by The Legal Blog
The learned Judges said that a just but unreasoned conclusion does not appear to be just to those who read the same. [read post]