Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2014, 6:29 am
Tumblr: NYT v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:09 pm
Traditionally, under the so-called “common law” that developed in the U.S. from the original English law, all states put persons coming onto property who sustained injury into one of three categories: Licensees, Invitees and Trespassers. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
State, A Brief History of the Netherlands p. 37). [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 11:13 am
Hokto Kinoko Company v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:30 am
Verona Tio, Doctoral candidate, University of Barcelona, Judicial Powers over Penalty Clauses and Proceedings followed before an English Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:04 pm
Said the Commission, the term ‘Tokaj’ appeared in the national provisions, not on its own but as part of compound terms consisting of a number of words, such as ‘Vinohradnícka oblasť Tokaj’, ‘Akostné víno pochádzajúce z vinohradníckej oblasti Tokaj’ or ‘Tokajské víno’. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:12 pm
Part V of the Ordinance relates to the distribution of estates in intestacy. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Bernard v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 2:45 am
This was enough to avoid summary judgment (Di Gioia v Independence Plus, Inc). [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:47 pm
A procedural chart has been produced in English (NDFI About Us, Procedures). [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
R. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:35 pm
Interestingly, given the amount of attention arbitration has gotten in recent years in state supreme courts around the country implementing the United States Supreme Court’s AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
The order was placed and paid for through the seller's English website and the watch was posted to him from Hong Kong. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:27 am
Tarapore & Co. [(1969) 3 SCC 562)], ONGC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
There, United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Sandifer v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Sandifer v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
While this Kat was taking part to the outstanding EIPIN congress in Alicante, he became aware of the fresh decision by the Madrid Court of Appeal in YouTube v Telecinco of 14 January 2014 [Madrid Court of Appeal decision No 11/2014, available here; non-official English translation kindly provided by the Kat-friend Carolina Pina (Garrigues Madrid) available here; the IPKat's note on the first instance decision here]. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:30 am
Via Al Brophy at the Faculty Lounge, we have word of a recently published essay by John V. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
On Afro-IP, Caroline Ncube relates the tale of a South African wine brand dispute (Alto v Altus) which ended with Altus preferring a name change (to Fenix) to the prospect of defending a trade mark infringement claim. [read post]
