Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 7,516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2014, 4:17 am
United States In Ratzlaf v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
The White House Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release December 17, 2014 Statement by the President on Cuba Policy Changes Cabinet Room 12:01 P.M. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 2:37 pm
Maatman, Jr. and Laura Maechtlen In a ruling on December 19, 2014, in EEOC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 5:33 am
My HMO series with David looks at the Management Regulations, and the case of Spencer v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:08 am
"I'm more prejudiced against, more closely watched. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
On Class 46, Laetitia Lagarde writes up a recent General Court case in which the word mark GENERIA and a figurative mark containing the word GENERALIA come in for a close comparison, here. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:01 pm
A notification under s21, Housing Act 1988 was served in October 2012. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:38 pm
The DWP present this as a set (and closed) list of factors. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:52 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in R. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:49 pm
I think those more than suffice.Am I necessarily against putting certain groups of plaintiffs more closely together; e.g., letting all the plaintiffs injured in X way or deceived in Y fashion go to trial together, an putting the W and/or Z plaintiffs on a different track? [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 11:32 am
Farrar v. [read post]
Fed. Dist. Court in FL Explains “Similarly Situated” Comparator Under RLUIPA’s Equal Terms Provision
11 Dec 2014, 5:38 pm
” Church of Our Savior v. [read post]
Fed. Dist. Court in FL Explains “Similarly Situated” Comparator Under RLUIPA’s Equal Terms Provision
11 Dec 2014, 5:38 pm
” Church of Our Savior v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 11:37 am
The budget of the United States shall be deemed unbalanced whenever the total amount of the public debt of the United States at the close of any fiscal year is greater than the total amount of such debt at the close of the preceding fiscal year.Section 2. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:57 am
California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
App. 2003); Gorman v. [read post]
