Search for: "House v. House" Results 4121 - 4140 of 41,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Cease v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:20 am
The Senate version appropriates $5 million more than the House version did for nonprofits.Title V, Sec. 571 [pg. 95 of PDF], extends the controversial Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious Worker Program until Sept. 30, 2012. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 10:59 am by Nicole Mazzocco
On July 15, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published its opinion in Hendee v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by Marc Climaco
Yet, in the midst of the seemingly relentless reminders of the ways that racial discrimination continues to plague our nation, the decision of the Supreme Court in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
A Road not Taken: Select Committees and the Estimates, 1880–1904Colin Lee        Part V: The Lex Parliamentaria Revisited16. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:19 am
Greenweb Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council; [2008] WLR (D) 286 “On the proper interpretation of ss 14(1) and 15 (3) of the Land Compensation Act 1961 the amount of compensation payable for compulsory acquisition of vacant land on which Victorian houses had stood prior to their destruction during the Second World War should be based on the assumption that planning permission had been granted for specified development even though planning permission for such… [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 11:41 am by India McKinney
Hit the button below to tell your elected officials to vote against this bill: Take action TELL congress: Defeat this bad 702 Bill Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 2:14 pm by Giles Peaker
Gul v Bilal, Stratford Hearing Centre, 18 October 2021 (unreported. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:50 am
New London, Connecticut Mayor Daryl Finizio recently signed an agreement authorizing the construction a “memorial park” on the former site of Susette Kelo’s “little pink house,” one of the fifteen residential properties condemned by the city as part of a failed development project that led to the Supreme Court’s controversial decision upholding the takings in Kelo v. [read post]