Search for: "In re Reader"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 29,761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2019, 3:21 pm
Rojas As many readers undoubtedly are aware, California’s governor recently signed into law legislation that would re-classify app-based workers as “employees” rather than as “independent contractors. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 5:20 pm
I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 3:58 pm
Beginning January 1, 2020, only employees earning at least $684 per week (equivalent to $35,568 per year for a full year worker) can qualify for payment on a salaried basis as employees exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) minimum wage and overtime requirements under the “White Collar Exemption” for executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, computer employees and at least $107, 342 per year to qualify as exempt from the minimum wage and overtime… [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:30 am
We welcome our readers to contact us with additional investigation techniques they would add to our investigation checklist. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
Employee Monitoring: Pros Here are some potential benefits of monitoring some employee activities: Helps to uncover problems, like harassment; May reduce theft; Can discover where workload may need to be redistributed (i.e., when some groups have too much time for nonwork activities); Can help to monitor and ensure safe practices are being followed; Can reduce incidences of employees wasting company time, as they know they’re being monitored and are then less likely to do so; May… [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 3:26 pm
CREAC tips: When you’re explaining a precedent case, it may not be enough to list the facts the court considered and tell the reader how the court ruled. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
A (super) informed reader wrote to tell me that a couple weeks ago, the Legislature passed AB 927, which is currently sitting on the Governor's desk. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 8:20 am
As always, we will keep Lawfare readers informed of any subsequent developments. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm
A reader pointed me to this decision, in French. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 9:30 am
Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) The following are job announcements of potential interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
" In re U.S. for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:55 am
But we’re mere baby steps away from wiping SJ off the map as well. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
Plus, you’re a lawyer, so you’re good at this stuff. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 10:52 am
Because “humans have never lived on a planet this hot, and we’re totally unprepared for what’s to come. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 7:16 am
Are these real readers?... [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:52 am
Wisconsin readers – If you’re looking for more citation guidance on Wisconsin-specific sources, check out the Wisconsin Guide to Citation, from the State Bar of Wisconsin as a complement to the Bluebook.It’s currently in its ninth edition. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 5:30 am
Readers with a historical sensibility will recall Mary Jo Frug’s powerful feminist reading of the Dawson, Harvey, and Henderson Contracts casebook (Mary Joe Frug, Re-Reading Contracts: A Feminist Analysis of a Contracts Casebook, 34 Am. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
Readers of MauledAgain know that I reject the idea of jobs being created by giving tax breaks to wealthy individuals and corporations that do not need more employees. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:54 am
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
