Search for: "In v. United States" Results 4121 - 4140 of 102,934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2008, 9:50 am
Zalewska v Department for Social Development House of Lords “The United Kingdom's decision to restrict the payment of welfare benefits for nationals of Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, known collectively as the A8 states, to those who had worked an uninterrupted 12 months in employment registered with the Home Office was not incompatible with European Union law. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:24 am by Matthew Kolken
The United States Supreme Court has granted cert in a case for the purpose of clarifying whether the Court's previous decision in Padilla v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:38 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm
I hadn't noticed until today that the Army Litigation Division lawyer who is "of counsel" for the United States in the Gray v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:01 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
United States District Court Judge Stefan Underhill has issued a ruling that augments the growing body of law rebuffing defendants’ attempts to use the U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:13 am by Devin C. Reid
On July 7, 2017, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, in Associated International Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:13 am by Devin C. Reid
On July 7, 2017, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, in Associated International Insurance Company v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:17 am by tracey
Regina (Aguilar Quila and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (AIRE Centre and others intervening) Regina (Bibi and another) v Same (Same intervening) [2011] UKSC 45; [2011] WLR (D) 291 “An immigration rule designed to deter forced marriages, which prevented the granting of leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as a spouse if either of the parties to the marriage was aged under 21, was an unjustified interference with the right to… [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:26 am
Unit member has limited rights in processing his or her grievance to arbitrationRine v Higgins, 244 A.D.2d 963After his union, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local 264, demanded arbitration challenging Rine's termination from his position as an Erie deputy sheriff, Rine asked a State Supreme Court justice to issue a declaratory judgment establishing his right to choose his own attorney to represent him in a… [read post]