Search for: "JOHNSON v. THE STATE"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 8,030
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2014, 6:19 am
Noting evidence that his office had a history of excluding minorities from the position and that decisionmakers, who claimed to have based the decision on qualifications, performed no interviews and reviewed no personnel records, a First Circuit panel found triable questions on pretext and reversed summary judgment for the government (Ahmed v Johnson, May 21, 2014, Lipez, K). [read post]
27 May 2014, 2:15 pm
Johnson (W.D. [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:34 am
In Sherman v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:34 am
In Sherman v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:37 am
By Marjorie Johnson, J.D. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:30 am
A little while ago, I wrote about Williams v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:05 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act, active efforts)* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlCases featured: Bodi v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
If civil rights lawyers begin invoking the principles elaborated and consolidated by popular spokesmen like Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey and Richard Nixon and Everett Dirksen, and not only depend on the opinions of the Warren and Burger Courts, these justices may begin to embrace an originalist framework that provides this great legacy with a solid foundation in popular sovereignty.Supreme Court litigators have one overriding objective: getting five votes on their side. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
Stiviano's affiliation with Magic Johnson, and denigrates minority professional basketball players for the Clippers African-Americans and other minorities in general. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:51 am
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The Ruling in Judicial Watch v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 12:09 pm
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:30 am
Johnson … v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:06 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:06 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
” (para 77)“I accept that what Mr Turner was describing was obvious,…” (para 85)To state what in itself should now be obvious, Virgin won, and Rovi’s patent was held invalid for lack of inventive step over the first piece of prior art. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:35 am
By Marjorie Johnson, J.D. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:32 am
By Marjorie Johnson, J.D. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm
In Johnson Controls, the Ninth Circuit decided back in 1989 that the structure, sequence and organization (SSO) of computer programs is copyrightable.The sky isn't falling in the eyes of the software industry at large. [read post]
