Search for: "Mark Case" Results 4121 - 4140 of 70,948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2008, 11:00 am
Honolulu lawyer and blogger Mark Murakami filed an amicus curiae brief in the case and has a number of posts about it on his blog, Hawaii Ocean Law.Update: I omitted that Mark Murakami's colleagues, Christi-Anne Kudo Chock and (lawyer/blogger) Robert Thomas were also involved in the amicus brief. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:06 pm by The Docket Navigator
Jun. 10, 2010) decision was published today and here are a couple of interesting articles discussing it:Federal Circuit Affirms Finding of No False Marking in Solo Cup Case by Justin Gray at the Gray On Claims blogWill this curtail the infestation of dandelions? [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 6:00 am by Lisa Salazar
”In finding deception, the CAFC relied on an inference of materiality for goods associated with a famous place for those goods, and distinguished case law that required a heightened standard to show an association between service marks and a geographic location.Case: In re Miracle Tuesday, LLC, Case No. 2011-1373 (Fed. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:43 am by CMS
Background In this post, Mark Whiteside, Partner at CMS, and Johanna Dodgson, Associate at CMS, comment on the Supreme Court’s judgment in Target Group Ltd v Commissions for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2023] UKSC 35. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm by Howard Bashman
“‘The Chief’ — What It Actually Tells Us About John Roberts’s Vote in the Initial ACA Case”: Mark Tushnet had this post yesterday at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 10:15 am by IPWatchdog
Over in the House of Representatives, the House Science Committee will mark up a series of bills to support research and development as well as technology transfer and commercialization, while the House Europe Subcommittee will explore international case studies in offshore wind renewable... [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:04 am by michael
Och-Ziff Management Europe Ltd and another v OCH Capital LLP and others [2010] EWHC 2599 (Ch) ; [2010] WLR(D) 265 “Purely internal use of a trade mark by its proprietor was not ‘genuine use’ of that mark and that internal use was not ‘use’ of a mark as a trade mark at all. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:54 pm by Katelyn Newman
After 44 years and some high-profile cases, Baltimore’s Fisher & Winner law firm partners were itching for a change. [read post]
20 May 2018, 6:36 pm by Jesse Minc Law Group
By way of example, imagine a case in which a woman approaches a plastic surgeon and complains about stretch marks on her abdomen which appeared after a pregnancy. [read post]
Out of the 70 new cases initiated in 2023, in addition to 28 pending from previous years, courts found defendants guilty in 37 cases, marking a historical high. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 4:20 pm
  So, if you go to the Precydent engine and enter the search phrase "insider trading" (not inside quotation marks; just the two words), you get a bunch of obviously relevant and authoritative cases, Chirarella, yada yada. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 5:24 pm by Mark Movsesian
The post Tradition and Compelling Interests in Religion Cases appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:38 am by Michael Atkins
In such cases, the mark does not function as a trademark because it only tells consumers about what’s being sold, rather than who is selling it. [read post]