Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 7,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2013, 9:30 pm
As a result of my earlier post on teaching "Law and the 'War on Terror,'" I learned about Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press), a new book by Stephen M. [read post]
12 May 2013, 2:30 am
Kaiser's Act of Congress: How America's Essential Institution Works, and How it Doesn't (Knopf). [read post]
9 May 2013, 12:33 pm
I hope the committee reschedules the vote quickly. [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:00 am
As always, please feel free to contact the Law Library of Congress if you have any questions. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:12 am
And this from a man who not too long ago used to put the phrase “Commander-in-Chief” between quotation marks. [read post]
8 May 2013, 6:23 am
This year’s event marked the 150th Anniversary of the issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation and the 50th Anniversary of the “I Have a Dream” speech by Dr. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 am
I explained why this number is way off the mark in Anyone Want to Count the Words in the Internal Revenue Code?. [read post]
7 May 2013, 2:41 pm
[I]naccurate information on the...effectiveness of the CIA's detention-interrogation program was provided by the CIA to the White House, the DOJ, Congress and the public. [read post]
4 May 2013, 7:40 am
On/off approach means that Congress can keep increasing penalties for copyright infringement with little/no 1A constraint. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:31 pm
I largely agree with the “1950 thesis” that Truman’s commitment of troops to Korea without authorization from Congress marked a sharp break in our constitutional tradition. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:04 pm
Another must-read piece, also, like Steve Coll's New Yorker essay, a review of Mark Mazzett's The Way of the Knife: The CIA, a Secret Army, and a War at the Ends of the Earth, is Jack Goldsmith's "The Trust Destroyer," in the current New Republic. [read post]
2 May 2013, 4:10 am
I'm sure I won't get more refined with age [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:50 pm
Like Mark Tushnet, I find myself genuinely ambivalent about drone attacks. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
And as for the substance of the matter–which, let’s not kid ourselves, is policy-making, for nothing in the Lanham Act really speaks to this question, and Congress will not do its job of making the policy here–I still stand, lonely-like, by my original, dogmatic view. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:29 am
This week, the news has been full of stories about next week’s special election for Congress in South Carolina, pitting former South Carolina governor Mark Sanford against Elizabeth Colbert Busch, the sister of TV host Stephen Colbert. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:45 am
At the end of this post I also provide information on some of the awesome resources about the mutiny and Pitcairn available here in the Library of Congress and in other places around the world, including links to digitized books and articles. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:49 pm
Its purpose (and function) is to make it harder to pass legislation, which means, among other things, that a member of either house of Congress must calculate the actual odds that the other house will be receptive. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:30 am
This provision, roughly speaking, forbids Congress from passing any law that criminalizes conduct that occurred before the law was passed. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:45 pm
The following is a guest post by Peter Roudik, Director of Legal Research at the Law Library of Congress. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:09 am
As I discussed previously, on October 19, 2012, the U.S. [read post]
