Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2012, 12:08 am
Thanks to District Court Judge Joan Ericksen of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, next week NeoCon attendees will be able to see and experience both SEEYOND and BEYOND products, without likely confusion, when she confirmed last week in a written order her previous oral denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Verscene Inc. and Seeyond Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and the similar case of Farha V. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 4:04 pm
" Id.The issue also includes a case note on the United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 8:24 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Stiftelsen SINTEF (EPLAW) Poland Voivodeship Administrative Court: Design, freedom and Polish law: VI SA / Wa 518/09 (Class 99) Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia looking into setting up special IP courts (IP Factor) South Africa Western Cape High Court finds in favour of Trimega, grants interim interdict preventing Real World Diagnostics from using IP related to drink-driving breathalysers (Afro-IP) (Afro-IP) United Kingdom Civil Law Reform Bill: latest news (PatLit) UK… [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:19 pm
The case also marks the debut of Harry Potter citations in the House of Lords. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 11:32 am
” United Servs. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm
(IPKat) Next lap in Force India vs Ethiad dispute (IPKat) United States US General US election brings IP uncertainty (IP Watch) US Patent Reform Patent Reform still on the table (Patents Post Grant Blog) US Patents Bond’s gun a hit at the USPTO (IPKat) Regional patent office coming to a city near you? [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:45 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:01 am
United States and the Long Struggle over Sexual Expression (University Press of Kansas) Ilya Shapiro, editor, Cato Supreme Court Review: 2012-2013 Mark Tushnet, In the Balance: Law and Politics on the Roberts Court (Harvard University Press) Forthcoming books Davison M. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:04 am
” Id. at 387 (quoting United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
They conduct business in connection with an “E1” design mark, though only two of the five defendants have ever used the mark in the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:00 am
In 2018, the United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 2:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
The most famous example is probably Andrew Jackson's veto of the bill to renew the charter of the Bank of the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 5:44 am
Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Riley v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:57 pm
" United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
” In the latest episode of SCOTUStalk (podcast), Mark Walsh joins Amy Howe to discuss last week’s oral argument in Iancu v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:01 am
According to the court (pages 20-21), the reason is that the Detention Treatment Act of 2005 declares that the term "United States," "when used in a geographic sense . . . does not include the United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
