Search for: "Martin v. Martin" Results 4121 - 4140 of 6,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2009, 4:06 am
Abraham, Martin, and John.Beck, Bogert, and Appice.Shepherd, Salter and Schwartz.Boy do those guys know how to rock! [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:47 am by John L. Welch
[Consolidated opposition to CLASSIC AMERICAN BLEND in standard character and design form for cigarettes, smoking tobacco, and related products [AMERICAN BLEND disclaimed], on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark CLASSIC CANADIAN for tobacco [CANADIAN disclaimed]; and petition for cancellation of a registration of ZIG ZAG CLASSIC AMERICAN BLEND for smoking tobacco on the same Section 2(d) ground and on the ground of non-use].April 27, 2011 - 2 PM: In re Cigars… [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:45 am by Lyle Denniston
  Justice Alito spoke only for himself in a separate opinion commenting on the denial of review of Martin v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:15 pm
Merpel agrees, but adds that sometimes it is quite possible to work out the identity of the concealed celebrity - as happened to the unfortunate footballer in one of the cases cited in this judgment, A v B.Right Mann for the jobHesco Bastion Ltd v TFL Defence Ltd and others, decided yesterday in the Chancery Division, is a ruling of Judge Martin Mann QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, the IPKat found a note on it on LexisNexis Butterworths. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:32 am by Daithí
Jacobsen v Katzer, now settled), or the EULA issues raised in MDY v Blizzard and the issues highlighted through Amazon’s Orwellian mess. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 8:17 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
People v Aldapa (1971) 17 CA3d 184, 188, 94 CR 579. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 12:02 am by Laura Sandwell
In the matter of an application by Martin Corey for Judicial Review, heard 7 October 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
In the matter of an application by Martin Corey for Judicial Review, heard 7 October 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
In the matter of an application by Martin Corey for Judicial Review, heard 7 October 2013. [read post]