Search for: "People v Challenger" Results 4121 - 4140 of 18,774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Philipp, which also involves the confiscation of Jewish people’s property during the Holocaust, concerns the scope of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:25 am by David Kopel
 The case challenged similarly restrictive issuance by a minority of California sheriffs. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 7:56 am by Amy Howe
Two people involved in landmark Supreme Court decisions died recently. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 8:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  The panelists will examine the history and foundational concepts supporting Indian health care, the challenges in meeting the current health care needs of Indian people and tribal communities, and the opportunities available to tribal governments when creating health care systems.2:45 – 3:00: Break 3:00 – 4:45: The Federal Tribal Recognition Process: Successes & Challenges. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
App. 1974) (arrest for reckless driving and driving without valid license); People v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:00 am by Unknown
The articles in this volume are concerned with the challenges of navigating through multiple paradoxes and contradictions when it comes to grasping these phenomena sociologically, on the levels of self-reflection, theorizing, and especially doing empirical research. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 7:12 am by Chase Strangio
We have witnessed this court disregard and infringe people’s bodily autonomy repeatedly, most recently with its devastating decision in Dobbs, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 5:53 am
If you think the Supreme Court lost its credibility and legitimacy in Bush v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 9:43 am
The Fair Pay Restoration Act (S. 1843) would reverse the recent Supreme Court decision Ledbetter v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 1:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Earlier this year, the United States Supreme Court reignited that discussion when it delivered the opinion in Citizens’ United v. [read post]